• Account & Lists
  • Order
  • 0
  • MENUMENU
    • Home
    • Courses
    • Webinars
    • Publication
      • Membership Publications
      • MagmaChem Publications
    • Geology Shop
    • Staff
    • Donate
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My account
    • Register
    • Contact Us
    Wilt Keith_1984_list Mo occurr
    October 14, 2020
    Keith et al 1983 Map Bulletin194 Map 18 Mineral Districts
    October 14, 2020

    Keith et al 1983 bulletin-194_metallic mineral districts az

    By: MagmaChem Research Institute

    $10.00

    1-16 Keith, S. B., Gest, D. E., DeWitt, E., Toll, N. W., and Everson, B. A., 1983, Metallic mineral districts and production in Arizona: Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, Bulletin 194, 58 p.

    Categories: Membership Publications, Mineral Resources, Publication
    Share
    0

    Customers who viewed this item also viewed

    • Reynolds et al 1980 Uranium Cordilleran metamorphic core complexes

      $10.00
    • Keith_1978_Origins of Arizona Copper Deposits-Hypotheses ocr

      $10.00
    • Keith_1978_Copper Production in Arizona, 1862-1977 ocr

      $10.00
    • Westra Keith 1981 Classification genesis stockwork Mo deposits

      $10.00
    • Swan et al 1981 Precambrian stratiform gold Yavapa co AZ

      $10.00
    • Westra Keith 1982 Stockwork molybdenum deposits reply EG

      $10.00
    • Placeholder

      Keith et al 1983 Map Bulletin194 Map 18 Mineral Districts

      $10.00
    • Wilt Keith_1984_list Mo occurr

      $10.00
    • Placeholder

      Keith-1984_Map_descrip_biblio_Mineralized_AZocr

      $10.00
    Description

    1-16 Keith, S. B., Gest, D. E., DeWitt, E., Toll, N. W., and Everson, B. A., 1983, Metallic mineral districts and production in Arizona: Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, Bulletin 194, 58 p.

    ABS
    Mineral districts presented herein and delineated on the enclosedmap were defined according to geological criteria.The principal goal was to arrange known metallic mineral occurrencesinto discreet metallogenic systems of similar age andstyle of mineralization. It Is strongly stressed that many of themetallic occurrences have poorly understood geological controlsand hence, many of the district boundaries will change asknowledge of both their deposits and geologic settings is improved.Nevertheless, this map initiates a geological approachto the subject of mine district definition and suggests that mineral districts are ultimately geological phenomena.
    Districts are color-coded according to the commodity producedand the type of mineralization. Estimated ages ofmineralization have been determined from radiometric datingof mineralization or stratigraphic position (either directly datedisotopically or correlated with adjacent radiometrically datedstratigraphy). A question mark has been placed on the mapafter the age designation if there is uncertainty about themineralization age of the district.
    Deposits with similar geology occur throughout the State, andsome attempts to assign designations based on geologic settingare incorporated, as shown in the legend. The porphyrycopper districts (1a) and stratabound volcanogenic massivesulfide districts (9) are assigned designations based entirely ongeologic setting. Other distinctions made on the basis of depositgeology include the subdivisions of designations (1)Copper-porphyry or stratabound; (6) Manganese-veins orstratabound; and (10) Uranium-breccia pipes, stratabound,or veins. It is also recognized that there is evidence of formationby hydrothermal epigenetic processes after sedimentationin many of the stratabound copper, manganese, anduranium districts.

    Key words
    Arizona. copper ores. economic geology. economics. gold ores. iron ores. lead-zinc deposits. metal ores. mines. mining. production. silver ores. United States. uranium ores.

    Product details

    1-16 Keith, S. B., Gest, D. E., DeWitt, E., Toll, N. W., and Everson, B. A., 1983, Metallic mineral districts and production in Arizona: Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, Bulletin 194, 58 p.

    ABS
    Mineral districts presented herein and delineated on the enclosedmap were defined according to geological criteria.The principal goal was to arrange known metallic mineral occurrencesinto discreet metallogenic systems of similar age andstyle of mineralization. It Is strongly stressed that many of themetallic occurrences have poorly understood geological controlsand hence, many of the district boundaries will change asknowledge of both their deposits and geologic settings is improved.Nevertheless, this map initiates a geological approachto the subject of mine district definition and suggests that mineral districts are ultimately geological phenomena.
    Districts are color-coded according to the commodity producedand the type of mineralization. Estimated ages ofmineralization have been determined from radiometric datingof mineralization or stratigraphic position (either directly datedisotopically or correlated with adjacent radiometrically datedstratigraphy). A question mark has been placed on the mapafter the age designation if there is uncertainty about themineralization age of the district.
    Deposits with similar geology occur throughout the State, andsome attempts to assign designations based on geologic settingare incorporated, as shown in the legend. The porphyrycopper districts (1a) and stratabound volcanogenic massivesulfide districts (9) are assigned designations based entirely ongeologic setting. Other distinctions made on the basis of depositgeology include the subdivisions of designations (1)Copper-porphyry or stratabound; (6) Manganese-veins orstratabound; and (10) Uranium-breccia pipes, stratabound,or veins. It is also recognized that there is evidence of formationby hydrothermal epigenetic processes after sedimentationin many of the stratabound copper, manganese, anduranium districts.

    Key words
    Arizona. copper ores. economic geology. economics. gold ores. iron ores. lead-zinc deposits. metal ores. mines. mining. production. silver ores. United States. uranium ores.

    Reviews (0)

    Customers' review

    5 stars 0 0 %
    4 stars 0 0 %
    3 stars 0 0 %
    2 stars 0 0 %
    1 star 0 0 %

    Reviews

    There are no reviews yet.

    Be the first to review “Keith et al 1983 bulletin-194_metallic mineral districts az” Cancel reply

    Related products

    • Keith Swan 1996 Laramide porphyry copper AZ SON NM GSN

      $10.00
    • Rasmussen 2012 Tombstone AZ mines minerals

      $10.00
    • Placeholder

      Abbott et al 1991 Magma chemistry ore deposits field trip 8 NV

      $10.00
    • Keith 1978 Supplement Paleosubduction geometries Cret Tert magmatic patterns SW N Am

      $10.00
    • 7-2 Callender et al 1979 Land of Cochise SE AZ NMGS

      1.00 out of 5
      $10.00
    • Rasmussen Hoag 2012 Vulture Mine Wickenburg Anderson Mine AZ

      $10.00

    Popular Course

    • Courses
    • Webinars

    Popular Publication

    • Membership Publications
    • MagmaChem Publications

    Download Free Publications

    MagmaChem Reference List
    Glossary Of MagmaChem Terminology

    We are a 501c3 Science Corporation, for Education and Research to Better Understand the Earth.

    Other Links

    • Home
    • Publication
    • Contact Us
    My Timeline magmachem
    © MagmaChemri. 2020. All Rights Reserved
      0