• Account & Lists
  • Order
  • 0
  • MENUMENU
    • Home
    • Courses
    • Webinars
    • Publication
      • Membership Publications
      • MagmaChem Publications
    • Geology Shop
    • Staff
    • Donate
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My account
    • Register
    • Contact Us
    Wilt_Keith_Theodore_1984_Mo_AZ usgs_ofr_84_830 ocr
    October 14, 2020
    Keith-1984_Map_descrip_biblio_Mineralized_AZocr
    October 14, 2020

    Welty et al 1985 Mine index b-196_metallic_mineral_districts_az-ocr

    By: MagmaChem Research Institute

    $0.00

    1-13 Welty, J. W., Reynolds, S. J., Keith, S. B., Gest, D. E., Trapp, R. A., and DeWitt, E., 1985, Mine index for metallic mineral districts of Arizona: Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Bulletin 196, 92 p.

    Categories: Membership Publications, Mineral Resources, Publication
    Share
    0

    Customers who viewed this item also viewed

    • Keith 1980 SW AZ Overthrust Oil-Gas Play Drill start

      $0.00
    • Reynolds et al 1980 Uranium Cordilleran metamorphic core complexes

      $0.00
    • Keith_1978_Origins of Arizona Copper Deposits-Hypotheses ocr

      $0.00
    • Keith 1978 future copper potential AZ ocr

      $0.00
    • Keith_1978_Copper Production in Arizona, 1862-1977 ocr

      $0.00
    • Keith 1979 Symposium porphyry copper deposits fieldnotes OCR

      $0.00
    • Wilt_Keith_1980_Molybdenum_Arizona_ABGMTFieldnotesSept

      $0.00
    • Westra Keith 1981 Classification genesis stockwork Mo deposits

      $0.00
    • Swan et al 1981 Precambrian stratiform gold Yavapa co AZ

      $0.00
    Description

    1-13 Welty, J. W., Reynolds, S. J., Keith, S. B., Gest, D. E., Trapp, R. A., and DeWitt, E., 1985, Mine index for metallic mineral districts of Arizona: Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Bulletin 196, 92 p.

    ABS
    This index provides a list of mines within each mineral district, as defined in Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Map 18 and Bulletin 194 (Keith and others, 1983a,b). In a mineral-district classification known metallic mineral occurrences are grouped according to geologic and metallogenic criteria rather than the geographic associations used in the traditional mining-district approach. Ideally, a mineral district should consist of mineral occurrences that have a common origin. A mineral-district classification is especially useful for understanding the geologic setting of mineralization and the distribution of known mineral occurrences with similar geology. A mineral-district map, however, is not a map of mineral potential. Although understanding the distribution of known mineral deposits is essential in evaluating mineral potential, many other geologic factors must also be considered (Fellows, 1984).
    Approximately 5,500 mines are listed in this index. The specific assignmentsof individual mines to particular mineral districts are made with varying degrees of confidence because the geology of Arizona is complex, incompletelymapped, and poorly understood. We have a high degree of confidence inthe assignments of major producers to specific mineral districts, but lessconfidence in the assignments of mines with minor production or insufficientpublished descriptions of the geologic settings. In the section on YavapaiCounty, we have marked those mines for which mineral-district assignments arecertain by the symbol “#” to demonstrate the overall accuracy of the compi1ation. As the understanding of the geology of Arizona and its minera1 richesexpands, so will the accuracy of mineral-district classifications.
    The index presented herein consists of a county-by-county list of minesand mineral districts. Two lists are given for each county: the first is acatalog of mines within each district; the second is an alphabetical crossindexof mines within the county. A mineral-district map of each county, at ascale of 1:1,000,000, precedes the lists.
    Known synonyms of mines are given in parentheses, but the list of synonymsis not exhaustive. In several cases, a mineral district is known to haveproduced ore, but the specific property names are unknown; the mine name istherefore listed as “unknown.” Entries listed as “unnamed” in uranium mineraldistricts were taken from Scarborough (1981). Some mine names have beenwithheld to avoid disclosing mining company proprietary data.
    Mineral-district production totals given in Bulletin 194 include metalsrecovered from milled ore, minor amounts of directly smelted ore, and reworkedtailings. Property names associated with reworked tailings and various mil1and smelter clean-ups are not included in this index. In general, only thosemines with known historic or current production are included. Table 1 (page 1)is a list of mineral districts with no reported production.

    Key words
    Apache County Arizona. Arizona. Cochise County Arizona.Coconino County Arizona.economic geology. Gila County Arizona.Graham County Arizona.Greenlee County Arizona.La Paz County Arizona.Maricopa County Arizona.metal ores. mines. Mohave County Arizona.Navajo County Arizona.Pima County Arizona.Pinal County Arizona.Santa Cruz County Arizona. United States. Yavapai County Arizona.Yuma County Arizona.

    Product details

    1-13 Welty, J. W., Reynolds, S. J., Keith, S. B., Gest, D. E., Trapp, R. A., and DeWitt, E., 1985, Mine index for metallic mineral districts of Arizona: Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Bulletin 196, 92 p.

    ABS
    This index provides a list of mines within each mineral district, as defined in Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Map 18 and Bulletin 194 (Keith and others, 1983a,b). In a mineral-district classification known metallic mineral occurrences are grouped according to geologic and metallogenic criteria rather than the geographic associations used in the traditional mining-district approach. Ideally, a mineral district should consist of mineral occurrences that have a common origin. A mineral-district classification is especially useful for understanding the geologic setting of mineralization and the distribution of known mineral occurrences with similar geology. A mineral-district map, however, is not a map of mineral potential. Although understanding the distribution of known mineral deposits is essential in evaluating mineral potential, many other geologic factors must also be considered (Fellows, 1984).
    Approximately 5,500 mines are listed in this index. The specific assignmentsof individual mines to particular mineral districts are made with varying degrees of confidence because the geology of Arizona is complex, incompletelymapped, and poorly understood. We have a high degree of confidence inthe assignments of major producers to specific mineral districts, but lessconfidence in the assignments of mines with minor production or insufficientpublished descriptions of the geologic settings. In the section on YavapaiCounty, we have marked those mines for which mineral-district assignments arecertain by the symbol “#” to demonstrate the overall accuracy of the compi1ation. As the understanding of the geology of Arizona and its minera1 richesexpands, so will the accuracy of mineral-district classifications.
    The index presented herein consists of a county-by-county list of minesand mineral districts. Two lists are given for each county: the first is acatalog of mines within each district; the second is an alphabetical crossindexof mines within the county. A mineral-district map of each county, at ascale of 1:1,000,000, precedes the lists.
    Known synonyms of mines are given in parentheses, but the list of synonymsis not exhaustive. In several cases, a mineral district is known to haveproduced ore, but the specific property names are unknown; the mine name istherefore listed as “unknown.” Entries listed as “unnamed” in uranium mineraldistricts were taken from Scarborough (1981). Some mine names have beenwithheld to avoid disclosing mining company proprietary data.
    Mineral-district production totals given in Bulletin 194 include metalsrecovered from milled ore, minor amounts of directly smelted ore, and reworkedtailings. Property names associated with reworked tailings and various mil1and smelter clean-ups are not included in this index. In general, only thosemines with known historic or current production are included. Table 1 (page 1)is a list of mineral districts with no reported production.

    Key words
    Apache County Arizona. Arizona. Cochise County Arizona.Coconino County Arizona.economic geology. Gila County Arizona.Graham County Arizona.Greenlee County Arizona.La Paz County Arizona.Maricopa County Arizona.metal ores. mines. Mohave County Arizona.Navajo County Arizona.Pima County Arizona.Pinal County Arizona.Santa Cruz County Arizona. United States. Yavapai County Arizona.Yuma County Arizona.

    Reviews (0)

    Customers' review

    5 stars 0 0 %
    4 stars 0 0 %
    3 stars 0 0 %
    2 stars 0 0 %
    1 star 0 0 %

    Reviews

    There are no reviews yet.

    Be the first to review “Welty et al 1985 Mine index b-196_metallic_mineral_districts_az-ocr” Cancel reply

    Related products

    • Reynolds Keith 1982 Geochemistry mineral potential peraluminous granitoids AZ

      $0.00
    • Placeholder

      Abbott et al 1991 Magma chemistry ore deposits field trip 8 NV

      $0.00
    • Swan Keith 1986 anorogenic granitoids N Am oblique subduction

      $0.00
    • Rasmussen 2012 Tombstone AZ mines minerals

      $0.00
    • Placeholder

      Cluer et al., 1997, Bell Creek Nappe Ren N Carlin Trend, NV

      $0.00
    • Keith et al 2017 UDH origin of Kupferschiefer

      $0.00

    Popular Course

    • Courses
    • Webinars

    Popular Publication

    • Membership Publications
    • MagmaChem Publications

    Download Free Publications

    MagmaChem Reference List
    Glossary Of MagmaChem Terminology

    We are a 501c3 Science Corporation, for Education and Research to Better Understand the Earth.

    Other Links

    • Home
    • Publication
    • Contact Us
    My Timeline magmachem
    © MagmaChemri. 2020. All Rights Reserved
      0